Lascaux cave art

Lascaux cave art

Thursday, June 22, 2017

'White Sharia'-a Personal View

The latest nutty concept which has gained a foothold in the 'white nationalist' world is that of 'white sharia'! Yes you have read that correctly. The advocates of this concept are trying to push the idea that women, Aryan women that is are in need of 'saving' from themselves and must be forced into a form of subjugation by their men folk and they would have no choice in the matter.

One may ask what on earth has sharia to do with the cultures of the Aryan peoples, given that it is an aspect of islam? Good question and the answer is: nothing! The supporters of the concept claim that even sharia itself is an Aryan concept because the word can be found in Urdu and Persian and because these are Indo-European languages the concept therefore must be Indo-European! This is patent simplistic nonsense as the Urdu and Persian equivalent words are simply a translation of the original term in Arabic! It has been referred to as an Indo-Aryan form of conduct! The reason why sharia was practised by the Persians and Indians is because it was forced upon them by fanatical Islamic Arabs. It is most certainly not an Aryan concept and has nothing whatsoever to do with Aryan conduct, spirituality or religion.

The supporters of 'white sharia' refer to this concept as a 'meme', a term that currently is quite popular within 'white nationalism' along with other ridiculous terms such as 'red pilling' and 'blue pilling' which I have never even heard of before. I am reliably informed that these are fabricated terms that feature in a well known science fiction film from 1999, The Matrix. I cannot comment as I have never seen the film in question. This is however an indication of how low the 'white nationalist' movement has come with its adoption of Hollywood terminology.

It is hoped that this 'meme' will spread within the white world. This is not however a good thing. Disease also spreads in populations and that is not a good thing either! Incredibly many of the supporters of 'white sharia' are also fanatical racialist 'christians'. I have never understood how a racialist can possibly be a christian given that anti-semitism is often a feature of the world view of many 'white nationalists' and christianity was built upon judaism as was islam but I put this down to what I term the Pilgrim Fathers' Complex. http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/usa-israel-and-pilgrim-fathers-complex.html 

'White nationalism' is a concept which originated in the USA. It is a movement with no clear ideology, Weltanschauung or agreed aims and goals. It tends to be dominated by racialist christians and christian identity types who are often very hostile towards people who do not subscribe to their distorted version of christianity. It becomes extremely difficult to find much in the way of common ground with many of them. The emphasis on the term 'white' is clearly American rather than European as we tend to use different terminology to describe or define race over here as there are many peoples who can be termed 'white' but are not Europoid or European in origin, such as semites for instance and this is why I tend to avoid use of this term.

Going back to the subject of this article, I find it incredible that white nationalists who are generally supporters of christianity should use an islamic term to describe and define a concept. They see no apparent contradiction in this and become hostile when it is pointed out to them, using typical playground insults such as 'cuck' (a very fashionable term of abuse at the moment), 'faggot', 'beta', 'autistic' (a new and fashionable insult) 'commie', 'jew' etc, etc. Reasoned argument becomes impossible due to their inflexible minds and entrenched views. Some supporters of 'white sharia' openly suggest that women who do not conform should be given a 'slap'. Women are viewed as little more than brood mares and should be encouraged to breed as early as possible. Some but not all supporters suggest that this should be at the onset of puberty. Photographs of 1950s women wearing head scarves or eastern European women in traditional costume are produced as 'evidence' that white women have always practised sharia and that it has only been in modern times that this has fallen away with the impact of liberalism! Yes, that is what they appear to believe, as ridiculous as it may seem! Whether they truly believe this rubbish is another matter. They may simply be repeating this in order for the idea to become instilled in other people without it being questioned-a common tactic.

What is most disturbing about 'white sharia' apart from the denigration of women who are (all) described as 'inferior', 'degenerate' and 'whores' by some sharia advocates is the way in which white Americans are becoming culturally subjugated to the customs or perceived customs of fanatical islam. This is a sign that islam is a now seen to be a conquering spiritual force in the 'west' and some whites feel the need to appropriate aspects of its language and culture for their own ends. This is usually how a conquered and subjugated people behave not a race of Sonnenmenschen!

I am no friend of feminism which I regard as a spiritual cancer in the 'western' world but 'white sharia' is an extreme reaction which makes it no better than feminism. It is its male counterpart and in many ways it is far worse than feminism. Both feminism and 'white sharia' are divisive and do not unite males and females but put a wedge between them. This is why I have written this article today to point out the dangers of this pernicious concept to alert my readers to think very carefully before they swallow this 'pill'.

Supporters of 'white sharia' say that a choice will be presented to the white world: islamic sharia or 'white sharia'-the only choice that is but I would counter this and say that the real choice is between WALHALLA and ALLAHLAW. 'White sharia' seems to fit very snugly into ALLAHLAW!

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Along the Wodenist Path: The Memoirs of Wulf Ingessunu-a Review

For some years now I wondered if a biography would eventually be written and published of the life of Wulf Ingessunu, the founder of folkish Wodenism in the late 20th century. Through the good work of Troy Southgate that book is now here and it is an autobiography, the life story being told by Wulf himself in an engaging and often humorous style. As one reads his words one hears his voice also as it is written in such a natural style.This is the latest work in the canon of Woden's Folk writings and in my opinion a highly important one. Up until now we have had the teachings of Woden's Folk. Vital as they are it is almost as important to know something of the life of the founder of a religion or a movement as well and this latest work fulfils that need.
In this book we learn of Wulf's early life, his experiences within party politics, his rejection of political parties and then his spiritual awakening leading him into Odinism and then Wodenism, an English form of Odinism which is folkish in nature and looks not only to the past where its roots are but to the future of Germanic man, recognising that Woden speaks to His initiates today, not just in the Eddas, sacred though they are to us.
Wulf relates many of his most important mystical experiences and it is clear that his life thus far has been that of living the Woden archetype.
I would encourage not only Wodenists, Odinists and Germanic heathens to purchase and read this work but also those who have misrepresented our work and mission so that they can see for themselves that this is the story of an ordinary man with an extraordinary life.